Quick answer
Shared hosting is low-cost but packs many sites on one server, causing slow speeds and security risks. Google Cloud Run runs your site in isolated containers that scale automatically with better performance and SSL management. For business sites where enquiries matter, Cloud Run managed from £15/month typically outperforms £5 shared hosting.
Who this applies to
Businesses on cheap hosting with slow PageSpeed scores, or those choosing hosting for a new custom website.
Main explanation
Shared hosting made sense when sites were static HTML. Modern business sites need HTTPS, fast mobile delivery, and reliability when traffic spikes. Shared servers struggle when neighbours run heavy WordPress installs or get attacked.
When shared hosting still works
- Personal hobby sites with minimal traffic
- Temporary landing pages with no commercial stakes
- Developers who enjoy server admin themselves
When Cloud Run is worth it
- Business sites where speed affects enquiries
- Next.js or modern framework deployments
- Campaigns or PR that may spike traffic
- Clients who want managed hosting without cPanel
Comparison table
| Factor | Shared hosting | Google Cloud Run |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | £3–£15 typical | From £15 managed |
| Speed | Variable, often slow | Consistently fast |
| Scaling | None | Automatic |
| Security | Shared risk | Container isolation |
| Best for | Low-stakes sites | Business lead generation |
Common mistakes
- Choosing hosting only on monthly price
- Staying on shared hosting with a slow WordPress site instead of rebuilding
- Expecting shared hosting to pass Core Web Vitals
Recommended next step
For a side-by-side decision, see Google Cloud Run vs shared hosting, then compare managed hosting tiers on our pricing page — from £15/month including deployment and monitoring.